C++ coders: The way that LLVM exploits undefined behavior may be a little extreme.
Vibe coders: What if, and hear me out, we didn't even expect the same behavior from the same inputs?
I'm having trouble reading things like this as anything other than a desire for more undefined behavior in programming languages.
https://mashable.com/article/llamacon-mark-zuckerberg-ai-writes-meta-code
If 30% of code at Microsoft is being written in a language that doesn't reliably compile to the same output, doesn't have a formal spec or grammar, and only has indirect error checking, what does that say about the languages specific to programming that we've been using?
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/satya-nadella-says-as-much-as-30percent-of-microsoft-code-is-written-by-ai.html
Reading Dennis Yi Tenen's "Literary Theory for Robots", talking about Athanasius Kircher's Mathematical Organ, and it's a good reminder to not dismiss shiny tech just because it is, but also to not let the well created wrapper convince us that there's more intelligence there than actually is.
Tried to write "order of magnitude", auto-corrupt suggested "order of manure". In the context (answers from LLMs on browser share vs ClouldFlare data), I'm not sure it was wrong.